DIY vs. AI-Powered Monitoring: Which Patent Infringement Strategy Fits Your Business?
Patent litigation is costly and fast-moving. With thousands of lawsuits filed annually in the U.S. and enforcement costs exceeding millions, a missed infringing product or patent filing can weaken licensing negotiations or limit protection of your core technology. The question isn’t whether you should monitor for infringement; it’s how you should do it.
Businesses today have three options:
🔍 DIY Monitoring
Free tools like USPTO PAIR and Google Alerts may seem attractive, but they require intensive manual review and rarely expose product-level infringement risks. Even when supported by attorneys, costs scale quickly and inconsistently.
📬 Traditional Watch Services
Paid services monitor publications across jurisdictions and deliver alerts, but they often stop at patent filings - not real-world product overlap. This makes them slow and inflexible for companies with tight enforcement timelines.
🤖 AI-Powered Monitoring (e.g., IP8)
The newest option uses semantic claim matching and real-time scanning of patents, product pages, and company literature. These tools reduce review time by up to 80%, deliver deeper insights, and scale cost-effectively for both small and large portfolios.
In competitive markets, automation provides the strongest ROI. Platforms like IP8 combine real-time surveillance with expert-level precision to catch infringement earlier and protect your IP value. DIY vs. Done-For-You: Choosing the Right Infringement Monitoring Strategy for Your Business - IP8.ai

Comments
Post a Comment